Chinese artists can't bear "Panda" Print E-mail
Written by Clifford Coonan   
Friday, 20 June 2008
Story Categories: China, Film, Hollywood In Asia, regulation,

BEIJING -- "Kung Fu Panda" is doing boffo B.O. Stateside, and is probably going to get Chinese auds all excited too, but not everyone is a fan of the antics of the reluctant martial arts bear.

Performance artist Zhao Bandi, perhaps best known for carrying around a toy panda and using panda images in a lot of his work, has called for a boycott of the film and taken his protest and a petition to the powerful State Administration of State Administration of Radio Film and Television in Beijing.

"If the Hollywood film ‘Kung Fu Panda’ is released on June 20th, it will be just like snatching the necklaces and watches from the corpses of disaster victims," the petition reads.

"Kung Fu Panda" has grossed close to $120 million since opening on June 6th and bows in cinemas across China on Friday, although there was a restricted screening at the Shanghai International Film Festival this week.

Zhao has a number of complaints to make – chiefly the fact that it is a Hollywood movie, and Sharon Stone comes from there, and her recent remarks linking karma to the devastating May 12th earthquake have earned her unending ire in China.

Hollywood is also exploiting Chinese culture with the movie and the Dreamworks studio was founded by Steven Spielberg, who is unpopular in China for pulling out as adviser to the Beijing Olympics because of China’s role in Sudan.

"The film "Kung Fu Panda" steals China’s national treasure, the panda, and kung fu," said Zhao, who confessed he had not seen the movie. SARFT head Tong Gang met Zhao for 20 minutes, said the Film Bureau understood Zhao’s feelings but that given the film had passed censorship it could not block the film.

Zhao said after the meeting he was happy for the film to screen, but suggested it not be shown in the earthquake zone in Sichuan, which is also home to the Giant Panda.

Zhao came in for criticism in blog postings, admittedly anonymous, on the Xinhua news agency website.

"This is completely a waste of time. There is no need for such sensitivity. China's cultural heritage belongs to the world," wrote one blogger.

"His thinking is too narrow. Chinese things can only be shot by the Chinese people themselves? Ridiculous! Does everything have to relate to patriotism? He is just an angry man. It is a very good film. Many elements contains Chinese tradition. Children love this film. So do adults. Why do not they think about the reasons that Chinese people can not produce such a film?" wrote another.


© Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comments (7)add comment
Jack: ...
It is wrong for Spielberg to preach others to mix politics and trades. The regimes are dangerous if their actions are ideology-driven. It is especially terrifying if the ideology is to liberalize/save other nations. The Soviet government, the Mao’s party, the Hitler’s empire, the xxxx administration, etc, are these examples. Instead of saving people’s lives, their actions cost millions of lives.

I am puzzled why Spielberg picked China for the issue of Darfur conflict. China did not create the problem. And China only accounts 8% of the weapons from foreign countries, according a report from the Sweden-based organization, SIPRI (www.sipri.org/contents/armstrad/PR_AT_data_2007.html/view?searchterm=darfur). Why would he ignore other major weapon suppliers, but focused his venomous remarks to the Chinese government?

Spielberg’s solution to support economic sanctions only hungers ordinary Sudanese people, not those criminals. Many of those hungry people are dying while Spielberg is preaching about his great ideas.

Most Chinese people are fed up with ideologically driven trades after many decades of suffering from rulers of those zealots. A better way to help the Sudanese people is to work with them on the economic development of the region. No slogan please!

If Spielberg were elected as a VP, he would have behaved like Cheney.
1

June 21, 2008
Jack: List of World’s largest arms exporters
The purpose of weapons is to kill people. Therefore, it is wrong to trade weapons. Here is the list (en.wikipedia.org/wili/Arms_industry) in the years between 2002 and 2007.
1. USA $53M
2. Russia $44M
3. Germany $14M
4. France $13M
5. UK $8.0M
6. Netherlands $4.8M
7. Sweden $3.4M
8. Italy $3.4M
9. China $3.3M
2

June 21, 2008
Jack: ...
Sorry, there is a typo. The link should be:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_industry
3

June 21, 2008
hater: how ignorant you all are http://www.stupidnuts.com
you know what? i am so fu**ing tired of people hating for no reason!!! i dont care what the hell steven speildburg said about china, its a freaking movie for chists sake!!! its not like it tells little kids how to kill china or any thing!!! its a freaking cartoon about a freaking panda!!! c'mon, you bunch of stupid idiots!!!
4

July 10, 2008
Quack: Panda Panda Panda
Hey you artist in dire need of attention...you want apology ? Keep dreaming !!!

You've already studied oil painting. Now it's time to study fictional painting.
5

July 19, 2008
potsmoker: ...
thats some crazy shit
6

July 31, 2008
Joe: ...
To be honest, Chinese people should be very grateful that Hollywood, or indeed ANYONE is making films about their culture, especially films aimed at younger audiences. Instead of being the scary closed off country that it understandably is portrayed as, it can now reach the younger generation, and spark their inspiration.

Zhao Bandi is a moron.

Ths stupidist thing I have heard for a long time: "it is a Hollywood movie, and Sharon Stone comes from there".

Well... I hate China, because it's an Asian country, and Burmas 'government' is in Asia too... so I hate China. How's that?

People like Zhao Bandi are the ones who should be silenced by the government. They are the ones who are adding to Chinas crazy image. Making people around the world think that these types of idiots are representative of the majority. That can't be true...

...can it?
7

August 13, 2008

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
There is a problem with the comment system, or you do not have javascript enabled.

busy
Last Updated ( Monday, 23 June 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >
Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell