The spotlight was on Hong Kong at a Friday AFM panel addressing the
city's co-production boom and its impact on China's film industry.
Producers made up most of the audience.
Moderated by Variety Asia
editor Patrick Frater, the panel "Hong Kong: Your Preferred Destination
for Asian Co-production and Gateway to China" featured Peggy Chiao,
producer at Arclight Films; Yu Dong, president-chairman of Beijing
Polybona Film Distribution; and Nansun Shi, exec director of Film
Workshop.
The Chinese film industry is experiencing "a period of
rapid growth," said Shi, pointing out that China's box office has grown
about 30% every year since 2003, reaching $350 million last year.
This
film-biz expansion accelerated four years ago, when the Chinese
government started reform and restructuring policies that allowed rise
of private sector companies and began to open the market to overseas
production companies. And with each year, Shi said, the government is
becoming increasingly liberal, economically speaking.
"The government has granted licenses to many more companies, big and small," he said.
Launched
in 2004 by the Chinese government, the Closer Economic Partnership
Arrangement (CEPA) has allowed Hong Kong companies a majority ownership
in cinemas and has freed up production practices.
For all
co-productions during the first year CEPA was in place, "There had to
be a 50-50 mix in the key crew and cast, and part of the film had to be
shot in China," Shi said. "But now we only have to use a 30% mainland
crew and cast, and the film can be shot anywhere in the world."
Co-producing
a film with a Hong Kong-based company facilitates access into and reach
within the Chinese film market, bypassing stricter censorship applying
to foreign pics and allowing these films to take a bigger share of the
Chinese box office.
For instance, Yu said Universal's "The Mummy,
which was distributed in China as a foreign import, was permitted only
13% rentals, whereas "The Mummy 3," which is now shooting and is
structured as an official co-production, will be treated as a local
Chinese film and generate rentals equivalent to 43% of its Chinese B.O.
According
to Yu, the Hong Kong government has also boosted the co-prod market by
recently investing HK$350 million ($38.7 million) to support the
production of films in Hong Kong.
Chiao said "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" revolutionized the Chinese film industry.
"It
set up a mode for co-productions with international financing, with the
cross-China talents and then world distribution helped by America's
majors," Chiao said.
But the presence of America's major studios
in China's film market has caused some setbacks by discouraging
independent moviemaking and original ideas, per Chiao.
"When
these American majors started to put money in local productions, it
resulted in a dichotomy between so-called big-budget, blockbuster films
(and smaller- or medium-budget films)," and that made it more difficult
for the latter to survive, Chiao said. "There's a joke about the
Chinese (audience) only watching films made by three directors with the
same cast."
The focus by Hollywood studios on mainstream and
commercial products has downgraded the quality of films by limiting
genres to periods and action kung-fu and concepts to "good guys vs. bad
guys," Chiao said. "The market has become monotonous, and a lot of
people complain about this situation."
For better or worse, concluded the Taiwanese producer, "China is like a black hole absorbing all kinds of resources."
|