|
India's Oscar selection challenged in court |
|
|
|
Written by Patrick Frater
|
|
Monday, 01 October 2007 |
HONG KONG – The selection process that chose "Eklavya – the Royal
Guard" as
India 's
candidate for the foreign language Oscar looks "prima facie biased."
That was the preliminary finding of the Mumbai High Court on Saturday in
response to a complaint from Bhavna Talwar, producer of rival
"Dharm."
She argued that her film was not selected because the 11-man jury
appointed by the Film Federation of India included Sudhir Mishra and Jagdish
Sharma, members well known to "Eklavya" producer-helmer Vidhu Vinod Chopra. It
since emerged that another juror was film editor Ranjit Bahadur, who put
together DVD sections for "Eklavya."
"We felt that since certain members of the jury were personally known to
'Eklavya''s producer, this direct nexus could have led to a bias," Talwar's
lawyer Vineet Naik said on Saturday. "Eklavya" won the selection over "Dharm" on
a six to five final vote.
Chopra said that he had no idea of the composition of the jury until
after its selection had been made.
The
court said that the FFI and other parties need to provide evidence by Oct 10,
well after the
Academy of Motion
Pictures ' deadline for accepting submission, when it
will decide whether or not to hear Talwar's
petition.
© Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
There is a problem with the comment system, or you do not have javascript enabled.
|
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 01 October 2007 )
|