BANGKOK
-- Cries of resentment erupted from Thai filmmakers and media activists last
week after the cabinet approved the new Film Act and submitted it for
parliamentary consideration.
The new bill,
which will institute a film rating system yet still allow the state a
legitimate right to cut or ban films, is believed by some observers to be worse
for artistic freedom than the existing law. Current regulation dates back to
1930.
"There
are three main points that we object to,” Pimpaka Towira, spokesman for the
Free Thai Cinema Movement, said. “The first is that government representatives
on the proposed rating committee will outnumber those from the filmmaking
community.
"Second
is the vague concept of age classification, which was conceived arbitrarily
without any proper study. Third, and most important, is that the new law still
allows cutting and banning (by the authorities), which is totally against the
spirit of a good rating system."
"Ong
Bak" and "The Protector" helmer Prachya Pinkaew, president of
Thai Directors Association who leads the Free Thai Cinema movement, says the
new law is intended to control rather than to support the industry. "The
combination of ratings plus the right to ban is not going to do us any good,"
he said. "The law also doesn’t mention anything about state support for
young or upcoming filmmakers."
The new Film
Act was drafted under the supervision of the Ministry of Culture, which has a
strongly conservative leaning.
A senior
officer at the ministry insists that the new bill has no intention to curb
artistic freedom. "The idea is to let everybody participate in the rating
committee,” she said. "But maybe Thai audiences are still not ready for
everything."
The Free Thai
Cinema Movement submitted a petition to the cabinet, but the letter did not
prompt reconsideration. “Now that the bill is in the Legislative Assembly, it’s
harder for us to do anything,” Pimpaka said. "But we will keep fighting
one way or the other."
© Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
There is a problem with the comment system, or you do not have javascript enabled.
|